Personality in Ayahuasca and Cannabis Users

Personality, not cognition, distinguishes chronic ayahuasca and cannabis users from non-users

About the study

This cross-sectional study compared regular ayahuasca users (n = 69), regular cannabis users (n = 56), and non-users (n = 94) matched on age, education, and IQ, in order to examine long-term neuropsychological performance, personality traits, and psychopathology. After verified abstinence (≥10 days for ayahuasca, ≥30 days for cannabis), participants completed executive function and working memory tasks (including the Iowa Gambling Task, Tower of London, Stroop, 2-back, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), as well as validated personality and symptom questionnaires. No significant differences emerged between groups on any neuropsychological measure, indicating that chronic use of ayahuasca or cannabis was not associated with detectable impairments in the cognitive domains assessed.

In contrast, personality traits clearly differentiated the groups. Multinomial regression analyses showed that ayahuasca users were characterized by significantly higher self-transcendence and lower harm avoidance and persistence, whereas cannabis users were associated with higher novelty seeking and impulsive nonconformity, and lower introvertive anhedonia. These personality variables substantially increased the explanatory power of the models, while neuropsychological performance and current psychopathology did not significantly predict group membership. Although ayahuasca users reported a higher lifetime prevalence of depression and anxiety diagnoses, no group differences in current symptom severity were observed.

Overall, the findings suggest that personality characteristics — rather than cognitive deficits or active psychopathology — most clearly distinguish chronic ayahuasca and cannabis users from non-users. The results align with prior evidence indicating no lasting neuropsychological impairment following sustained abstinence, but they should be interpreted cautiously given the cross-sectional design, self-selected and culturally specific samples (ritual ayahuasca communities and cannabis activist networks), and the limited range of cognitive domains assessed.

Abstract

The increasing interest in the therapeutic potential of psychedelics and cannabis underscores the need to understand their long-term neuropsychological and personality effects. This cross-sectional study compared regular users of ayahuasca (n = 69), cannabis (n = 56), and non-substance users (n = 94) on a battery of neuropsychological tasks and psychological questionnaires. Participants were matched by age, education, and IQ and abstained from drug use for at least 10–30 days before assessment. No significant group differences were observed in neuropsychological performance. However, multinomial regression analyses revealed that personality traits best distinguished the user groups. Ayahuasca users exhibited significantly higher self-transcendence and lower harm avoidance and persistence, while cannabis users were associated with higher novelty seeking and impulsive nonconformity, as well as lower introvertive anhedonia. These results persisted after controlling for demographics and psychiatric history. Contrary to previous findings associating cannabis with neurocognitive impairments and psychopathology, no significant deficits were found in the abstinent cannabis users. Similarly, ayahuasca users, despite a higher lifetime prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders, showed no current psychopathological symptoms. Our findings suggest that chronic use of ayahuasca or cannabis is not associated with detectable lasting neuropsychological impairments in the executive and working memory tasks assessed in this study, and that personality characteristics—rather than cognition or psychopathology—most clearly distinguish chronic users from non-users. However, these results are based on a cross-sectional, self-selected, non–treatment-seeking sample and may therefore not be representative of all ayahuasca and cannabis users. These insights may inform future clinical applications and safety evaluations of these substances.

Link to the study

Contact ICEERS Research team